1. A urine organic acids lab done with specimen from his critical moment (his hypoglycemia) would reveal his diagnosis, so six days after it was ordered, the Seattle Children’s Hospital Biochemical Genetics Laboratory cancelled it and did the same lab with an earlier specimen while giving excuses for the abnormal values.
2.According to the book Pediatric Critical Care, specimens from critical events should be used. However, SCH PICU used a specimen manipulated to look normal for the blood acylcarnitine lab and destroyed the critical sample.
3. The patient’s acylcarnitine profiles were readily available from his NBS, but the PICU blocked the request for the values and poisoned him with Nutramigen over the weekend.
4.Pathology labs are widely considered the “gold standard” in determining one’s diagnosis, yet the pathology report that the patient received was full of many doctors’ deception.
5. As soon as his parents allowed him onto the transplant list, SCH switched his formula to Pregstimil which caused his ammonia to stabilize at about two times the normal maximum.
6. Though his blood ammonia decreased only when given glucose, SCH continued to give formulas which caused his ammonia to rise. Under SCH’s care, his body weight dropped from the 50th percentile to less than the 5th percentile. Only Dr. Benjamin Shneider revealed that the patient’s injuries were neither chronic nor widespread like SCH claimed.
7. Though his blood ammonia decreased only when given glucose, SCH continued to give formulas which caused his ammonia to rise. Under SCH’s care, his body weight dropped from the 50th percentile to less than the 5th percentile. Only Dr. Benjamin Shneider revealed that the patient’s injuries were neither chronic nor widespread like SCH claimed.
8. CPS visited the patient’s family, forcing his parents to choose between listening to SCH and slowly poisoning their son with too much long chain fat or losing their child.
9. After reviewing the biopsy slides, a CCHMC hepatologist noted that the injuries were not chronic, as SCH had said, but acute, implying that the injuries occurred very quickly near the time of the biopsy.
10. CWRU CIDEM compared a T-25 reference to the T-75 test in order to make the CPT-II values look normal, which caused the CPT-I values to become approximately three times the reference. After adjusting, the values confirm the patient’s condition and therefore the nationwide cover-ups.
